Joyriding is considered anytime someone drives another person’s vehicle without their permission and they are aware that they do not have the owner’s permission. Even though no theft or violence is involved, joyriding is still considered a criminal offense.
An experienced theft attorney can help explain the charges to someone. Contact a DC joyriding lawyer who can assist in learning about the incident from their perspective.
The government is required to prove that the defendant operated a motor vehicle without the owner’s permission for his or her own use or purpose in a joyriding case. Additionally, the government must show that the defendant operated the vehicle knowing that they did so without the owner’s permission.
The government must introduce some evidence showing that the owner told the person that he or she was not allowed to drive the car or that the person acted or behaved in such a way to indicate they knew they did not have permission. For example, furtive movements or speeding away from the owner or police officers could be considered circumstantial evidence showing that the individual knew they did not have the owner’s permission to operate the car. It could be critical for a DC lawyer to help the accused individual present beneficial evidence in court if they have been charged with joyriding.
Another example of a joyriding scenario occurs when a teenager knows he does not have his parents’ consent to drive their car and drives their car when the parents are out of town. This is not a theft because the teenager does not intend to deprive the parents of their car. However, it is still an unauthorized use of the motor vehicle, which makes it a crime.
Another example of joyriding is when a valet at a restaurant takes the customer’s car out for a drive while the customer is inside the restaurant. In this scenario, the customer gave the valet permission to drive his or her car, but only for the purpose of parking the car for the customer’s own benefit. It is considered joyriding if the valet, instead of parking the car, takes a customer’s car out for a ride for the valet’s own use or purpose.
Similar to joyriding, failing to return a leased vehicle can lead to criminal charges for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. If a person fails to return the leased vehicle to the specified place and time within 18 days after the leasing party sent a letter demanding the return of the vehicle, that person could be charged with unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
Failing to return a leased vehicle can also be a scenario that is considered to be joyriding. As a DC lawyer knows, joyriding is considered the unauthorized use of the vehicle because the person who formerly leased the car no longer has permission to use the vehicle.
A DC joyriding lawyer keeps someone apprised of developments in their case and is their advocate when discussing potential resolutions and plea agreements with the prosecutor. The lawyer develops defenses to help fight the case during trial and negotiations with the government.
David Benowitz and his firm are the best strategic and compassionate teams you will work with. Mr. Benowitz and his team are diligent and proactive, which is further enhanced by David’s methodic and strategic approach to law. My case was a very complicated and emotionally charged case involving classified information, where I was facing three indictments, two carrying life sentences and one carrying 20 years. Mr. Benowitz utilized a network of lawyers coupled with his own strategy to navigate the case to success! I sincerely recommend David Benowitz quite literally with my life.
I found David to be very dedicated to fighting for your loved one’s rights. I also highly appreciated the fact that David kept us informed and empowered throughout the whole process.
Mr. Benowitz is an incredibly knowledgeable and dedicated professional. His commitments to social justice and community outreach are exemplary. I wholeheartedly recommend him for any matter.